Interdisciplinary Design for a Middle-Level Curriculum
How does your
understanding of young adolescents and middle-level philosophy
(interdisciplinary curriculum) affect curriculum planning?
“Just because students know things, doesn’t mean they understand
it.” (McTighe, 2013)
I LOVE the
above quote from Jay McTighe. So often the emphasis seems to be on getting the
right answer, learning for a test, or standardized test scores but the real
goal in education should be to teach and assess for understanding not necessarily
just accuracy. And it starts with students being able to understand why they
are learning the material in the first place.
Let’s
begin first with the key idea that was in most if not all of the material for
this module – Backwards design. This concept seems to be a key component of
successful curriculum and lesson planning especially when a team of
middle-level teachers are focused on an interdisciplinary delivery of ideas and
concepts. By starting with goals, the team can find commonalities among the
content areas and prioritize those that they should focus on across all
classrooms. Teachers then can share common language around the reason for the
unit and desired outcomes, reinforcing the learning process for all students on
the team. I thought Grant Wiggins boiled the idea down well: “Really think hard
about what your long-term goals demand of short-term teaching, learning, and assessing.”
(Wiggins, 2012) If we, as educators, only focus on the short-term, we could
miss bigger and more impactful benefits of this teaming design for our
young-adolescent students.
I also really liked how Jay McTighe
emphasized that assessments need to be deeper than surface level. They shouldn’t
only measure the knowledge but the understanding of the course content. I am
reading a book, Hope and Despair in the American the City, and in it,
the author tells a story of an American History Middle School teacher he met. Each
year, the teacher assigns his students the task of writing a short story
explaining the establishment and growth of our modern day government. It is a
year long project that the students revisit and revise as they gather more
information. At the end of the year, the students then visit a third-grade
classroom and use their short stories to teach these younger students the
history of our American government. (Grant, 2022) What a great way to measure a
student’s understanding of a year’s learning while giving them the authentic
task of teaching another student?
Understanding
goals, authentic assessments of not only knowledge but understanding, and synergy
between the disciplines has the added benefit of student lead learning and increased
autonomy (Wiggins, 2012) which is something young adolescents are craving in
their curriculum and every day lives. It was evident throughout the above mentioned
video how enthusiastic students were that they talked to about not only what
they were learning but how. I appreciated that the administrator who they interviewed
mentioned that students could articulate the why behind learning now with the
UbD program in place.
This idea of designing a unit or backwards
design is something I have not had much exposure to in any of my classes,
placements or even in my own schooling experience. However, it does seem like
this concept may have been one of the reasons professors list the desired
learning outcomes on a syllabus at the beginning of each semester. I usually
find that section of the syllabus overwhelming and sometimes meaningless
because I don’t have an initial understanding of the topics. I want to take that experience that I have as
a student and ensure that I am creating better understanding of learning goals
and outcomes for my future middle school students. I liked how one student in
the video “What is UbD?” said, am I’m paraphrasing, “I like how I understand
how this applies to the real world now vs. learning it in several years when I
have my first job.” And using the real-world is a great way to create real
values in learning for them.
I am looking forward to my fall
placement and student teaching to get more practice in the use of both
backwards and interdisciplinary unit design!
References
Grant, G.
(2022). Chapter 4: There are No Bad Schools in Raleigh . In Hope and despair
in the American city: Why there are no bad schools in Raleigh (pp.
101–102). essay, Harvard University Press.
McTighe, J.
(2013, July 17). What is Understanding by Design: Jay McTighe. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8F1SnWaIfE&t=85s
Wiggins, G.
(2012, February 10). What is UbD? Grant Wiggins Answers, with Video Cases.
YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsDgfC3SjhM&t=31s



Comments
Post a Comment